Free tool

Free X Banger Meter

Paste the post you’re about to publish. We score it against X’s published For You weights (replies, shares, dwell, link heads, and the big negatives) and rate it from shit to absolute banger — with concrete fixes before you hit post.

Free X banger meter. Paste your draft and get a 0–100 score plus feedback from published For You weights. No X login.

All X Mini Apps →

Draft post

Score my draft

Example

Draft · open weights · tips

/100

Tier Banger

How it works

1
Paste your draft

Text only is enough. Tick image/video if you’ll attach media. No X login.
2
Score against open weights

We detect signals (question, bait, bare links, hashtag piles, length) and apply published head weights from xai-org/x-algorithm.
3
Read the tier + fix list

Get a 0–100 score (50 ≈ median draft), a rating from shit to absolute banger, and tips tied to the official weight table.

Published weights, light draft check

X open-sourced For You ranking weights. A reply is weighted far above a like; copy-link share is the heaviest positive head; opening a link pays almost nothing; engagement bait invites harsh negatives. This Mini App is a light compose meter: text in, relative score out.

Same open weight table as our X Algorithm Checker

Tiers from shit → absolute banger

Tips cite the published coefficients

What this does not do

Prospective content score only — not a prediction of impressions or a live Phoenix inference.
50 means “about as predisposed as a typical text-only post,” not a school grade.
Account reputation, mutuals, and real engagement rates are out of scope for this light meter.
For research and draft editing — not a guarantee of reach.

Frequently asked questions

Is 50 a bad score?

No. 50 is a typical text-only draft with no strong signals. Above 50 means the draft is more predisposed than median on the heads we model; below means weaker.

Are these the real X algorithm weights?

Yes for the head coefficients — from xai-org/x-algorithm (home-mixer / vm-ranker params). Action probabilities for a draft are estimates from content signals, because a browser cannot run Phoenix.

Why did my “like if you agree” post score so low?

Engagement-bait phrasing boosts predicted not-interested and mute. Those negatives are large, and net-negative posts get squashed below every positive post in the published scorer math.

How is this different from the X Algorithm Checker?

The Algorithm Checker scores your last 14 days of live posts (engagement you already earned). The Banger Meter scores a draft before you post.

Will a high score go viral?

No tool can promise that. This only estimates how the published weight table would lean on the content signals we can see.